Understand
Recognise what the system does and where uncertainty remains. A language model can produce plausible but incorrect information.
AI literacy means using AI consciously, critically and responsibly. You do not need to become a programmer. You do need to judge when AI helps, what information to share and when to intervene.
Practical · Relevant to your work · Dutch or English
01A clear instruction
02A useful draft
03A critical review
04An informed decision
A convincing answer is not necessarily correct. An AI-literate employee understands the capabilities and limitations of the tools they use, can assess results and knows where their responsibility begins.
Recognise what the system does and where uncertainty remains. A language model can produce plausible but incorrect information.
Choose suitable tasks, provide relevant context and define the expected output.
Check facts, sources, calculations, assumptions and potential bias before using results.
Consider data, copyright and consequences for colleagues and customers. Know when to seek advice.
Build confidence through understanding.
A shared approach to everyday work.
These studies measure AI use or assistance, not the return on AI Clarity training. They illustrate why skills and appropriate task selection matter. Results depend on the task, team and tool.
In an experiment involving 453 college-educated professionals, bounded writing tasks took less time with ChatGPT. Assessed quality improved by 18%.
Across 5,172 customer support agents, productivity rose on average with an AI assistant. Effects varied between workers.
In the 2024 global survey of 31,000 knowledge workers, three quarters reported using AI at work.
No guaranteed time savings or revenue claims. We establish your baseline and test what improves in your actual work.
Consider a new lead requesting an offer. A good workflow combines speed with review.
Use approved services, rates and terms. Share only necessary data in a suitable environment.
Draft a relevant reply and proposal. Turn missing information into questions rather than invented facts.
Check prices, tone and commitments. Standard acknowledgements can be automatic; custom quotes are approved first.
The European Commission’s current guidance says Article 4 requires providers and deployers to take measures supporting AI literacy, considering knowledge, experience, context and risks.
There is no mandatory standard certificate or universal training format. The guidance clarifies that no specific individual proficiency level is guaranteed. Additional requirements apply to human oversight of high-risk systems.
Europese Commissie / European Commission — AI Literacy Q&A ↗
Source checked on 20 October 2026. Practical information, not legal advice. Training does not automatically establish compliance.
We design the programme around your team’s tasks and tools. First establish what is needed rather than prescribe identical training for everyone.
Map tools, roles and recurring tasks.
Use safe example data to practise instructions, review results and recognise exceptions.
Create a practical checklist, approved tools, review points and a named contact.
Record learning activities, review experience and update guidance when tools or tasks change.
Compare a representative task before and after the pilot: completion time, quality using the same criteria, corrections and independent completion. Include review and maintenance time. Discuss whether staff know when to stop or seek advice.
Select what is already in place. This check stays in your browser and is not a test or compliance assessment.
No. Most staff need practical skills: choosing tasks, giving context, checking outputs and handling data. Technical roles have different learning needs.
Prompting is one part. AI literacy also covers limitations, sources, privacy, bias, copyright and the impact of decisions on people.
No. The figures concern AI assistance and use in specific studies, not the effect of our training. We agree how to evaluate your programme in advance.
That depends on the roles, tools, prior knowledge and work involved. We discuss requirements and then propose scope, timing and pricing.
Yes. We work online in Dutch or English, using scenarios relevant to your team.
Research figures retain their original context and year. Our proposed programme is not an intervention tested in these studies. The 2025 AP publication provides background; the Commission Q&A is used for current Article 4 guidance.
Tell us about your team, tools and questions. Together we identify a practical starting point.